The Magazine

Indigenous Textile Makers Reclaim Culture Through Craft

Close-up of a weaver’s hands using a wooden tool to work threads through a loom. A geometric pattern in black, white, gray, and red is taking shape in the rug.
Each month, about 100 Diné weavers bring their work to the Crownpoint Navajo Rug Auction in eastern Navajo Nation, where rugs are tagged with their makers’ names and hometowns before bidding begins. Photo Credit: Steven Allan from Getty Images Signature.

At four in the afternoon on the first Friday of each month, the hallway outside the Crownpoint Elementary School gymnasium begins filling with rugs ahead of the evening auction. Located in T’iis ts’ooz nideeshgiizh (“Crownpoint”), a Diné community in the eastern Navajo Nation in present-day “New Mexico,” the school hosts about 100 weavers each month. They arrive carrying their rugs in plastic tubs and bags, ready to display their work and put it up for sale.

Volunteers at the school inspect each piece and attach a tag with the maker’s name and hometown so buyers can trace the work to a named person rather than an anonymous style. For nearly two hours until the auction begins, buyers see the rugs before bidding starts at 6 p.m. Run by the Navajo Weavers Association of Crownpoint, the Crownpoint Navajo Rug Auction dates back to 1964. Co-founded by Bill Palmer and Pauline McCauley, the auction was created to connect Diné weavers directly with buyers and has continued for more than 60 years. In-person auctions resumed in January 2023 after the COVID-19 pandemic, when participation had fallen by about half. “We lost a lot of our elder weavers,” treasurer Marcella Hale told New Mexico Magazine.

For generations, Diné weaving has survived attempts to control its makers, its production, and the markets in which it is sold. During the Long Walk in the 1860s, the “U.S.” Army forced Diné people from their homelands in present-day “Arizona” and “New Mexico” to Hwéeldi (“Bosque Redondo”), near “Fort Sumner” in eastern “New Mexico.” Thousands endured imprisonment, starvation, and disease before the 1868 treaty allowed their return. After Diné people returned to their homelands, trading posts became powerful intermediaries between weavers and non-Native buyers, shaping which styles and designs reached outside markets.

Pauline Thomas, a Diné artist from “Naschitti,” has sold her rugs at “Crownpoint” for more than two decades. Her great-grandmother wove and raised sheep, and Thomas learned to card and spin wool as a child. Her mother later taught her how to keep her weaving straight. When the time came, Thomas began teaching her granddaughter simple lines before introducing more complex patterns; she was only 11 when her turquoise-and-black Eye Dazzler rug sold in July 2025.

Reclaiming Diné weaving also extends beyond the auction, as artists like TahNibaa Naataanii work to sustain and deepen these traditions in their own practices.

Media and press freedoms are globally under attack and severely underfunded

Help us in our mission to create Indigenous led journalism and media content. We are the only free Indigenous created and operated independent international publication that runs in English and Spanish and that is committed to disability and language justice.

Like Thomas, Naataanii learned to handle wool and weave as a child. She later returned to her ancestral land at Bis dah ʼazką́ (“Table Mesa”), south of “Shiprock,” where she built a practice around raising Navajo-Churro sheep, preparing and dyeing wool, spinning yarn, and weaving. In 2006, Naataanii and her mother, Sarah Naataanii, had their work included in a Diné-run rug auction at the Pagosa Fiber Festival in “Colorado.” Organized by Diné be’ iiná, the auction sought to reduce traders’ control over sales and give Diné weavers more say in how their work was priced and sold.

This auction, though separate from the one at “Crownpoint,” grew from the same effort to give weavers greater control over their work. In an interview with the National Endowment for the Arts, Naataanii said, “I’m in partnership with this work, and so I have to respect that.” Naataanii has often spoken about moving beyond regional patterns shaped for outside markets and creating textiles that respond to her own artistic ideas and Diné life. Some of her work returns to functional forms such as blankets, ponchos, and shawls; others address subjects such as the changing construction of the hogan or Diné home and the Navajo Code Talkers, the Diné service members who transmitted military messages using a code based on their language during World War II.

But the evolution of Diné weaving also raises a larger question: Who decides what the tradition looks like, and who profits from it?

According to the Arizona State Museum, 19th-century Diné weavers adapted designs from Mexican sarapes, rectangular woven blankets or garments that included serrated diamonds and vertical zigzags. The influence of traders is also seen in the Two Grey Hills textile style, named after a trading post in northwestern “New Mexico.” In the early 20th century, traders there encouraged Diné weavers to use undyed, hand-spun wool in black, white, gray, brown, and tan. These colors became a hallmark of the regional style.

Retailers have also appropriated Diné culture by using the Navajo name to market products without the Nation’s permission. In 2012, the Navajo Nation sued Urban Outfitters over products marketed under names including “Navajo.” The Nation argued, among other claims, that the branding falsely suggested an Indigenous origin. The parties settled in 2016 on confidential terms and announced plans to collaborate on authentic Indigenous jewelry. It is unclear whether the collection was ever produced.

In Anishinaabe communities across the “Great Lakes” region of present-day “Canada,” reclamation includes restoring access to porcupine quillwork. Anishinaabe artists such as Amber Waboose and Dillon Bickell are teaching and documenting a practice whose intergenerational transmission has been disrupted.

Ojibwe artist Amber Waboose (Batchewana First Nation) teaches Anishinaabe porcupine quillwork through workshops that begin with the material itself: how quills are gathered, washed, sorted, and dyed; and how they are worked into small pieces. Waboose’s teaching policy is explicit: First Nations, Inuit, and Métis participants are the priority because, as said on the workshop site, the purpose is cultural revitalization, reclamation, and reconnecting Indigenous people with an art form that has become difficult to access. Her choice sets the terms of access: who receives knowledge first, how much is taught, and what remains beyond an introductory workshop. “My priority is to revive quillwork in Indigenous communities,” Waboose writes on her workshop page.

For Dillon Bickell (Chippewas of Rama First Nation), an Anishinaabe quill worker, the break in transmission was personal. His grandmother, Lila Ingersoll, practiced quillwork, but died when his mother was young. Bickell never met her. He first tried the practice himself in a community crafting circle in 2021. “I find it almost meditative and healing working with those materials, thinking of my grandma, and just pushing the art form,” he said in an interview with The Villager early this year.

Brickell has described quillwork in Rama as a practice that once moved through families and knowledge keepers, while resources for learning it today can be difficult to find. Now he wants to document the learnings and teach others so future generations have what he did not. Bickell uses inherited quillwork techniques to create new images. Alongside floral and animal imagery, he makes quillwork depicting Grogu from The Mandalorian, Black Panther, and Mario. The materials and techniques remain connected to Anishinaabe practice while the imagery moves unapologetically into the present.

This is how the usual argument over authenticity begins to fall apart. Non-Indigenous buyers often expect Indigenous art to be immediately recognizable as traditional. That expectation can reward repetition while treating innovation as dilution. That control extends to the value of the work itself.

At “Crownpoint,” some of those answers appear on a small tag attached to each rug — a price the maker helps determine. According to a 2025 report from New Mexico Magazine, weavers receive 85% of the final sale price and are paid on the night of the auction. The association uses the fees it collects to cover the event and support community programs, including food distribution and assistance for elders.

The “Crownpoint” auction and the work of Waboose and Bickell show how reclamation can respond to different community needs. At “Crownpoint,” Diné weavers retain more control over the sale and value of their work. For Waboose and Bickell, reclamation means deciding how quillwork knowledge is shared and helping future generations access teachings that have nearly disappeared.

Colonial extraction has often separated Indigenous culture from Indigenous control. Reclamation returns that control to the people whose knowledge and labor sustain these practices. The survival of the art matters, and so does the right to decide how it is made, taught, and valued.

About the Author

Aashima Rawal is an India-based freelance writer whose work has appeared in Art UK, Business Insider, Nonprofit Quarterly, Scarleteen, Scary Mommy, and FUTBOLISTA Magazine. She writes about art, culture, identity, parenting, and digital life.

Media and press freedoms are globally under attack and severely underfunded

Help us in our mission to create Indigenous led journalism and media content. We are the only free Indigenous created and operated independent international publication that runs in English and Spanish and that is committed to disability and language justice.

 Our work crosses borders, oceans, languages, disabilities, digital divides, and prison walls. Your donation is essential to continuing our work.